logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2019.10.25 2019고단892
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 16, 2012, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 4 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Chungcheong District Court’s Chungcheong District Court’s Chungcheong on November 16, 2012; on December 19, 2008, a summary order of KRW 5 million for a fine of KRW 5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the credit support of Suwon District Court; on August 5, 2003, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving).

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a B car.

1. On June 3, 2019, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from D Driving) (hereinafter “Aggravated Punishment, etc.”) (hereinafter “Aggravated Punishment, etc.”) led to the following three-lanes of the five-lane road in the front of D/C located in C in Ansan-si, in a state of under the influence of alcohol of 0.186% of blood alcohol concentration, depending on the scambing distance from the scamb

At the time, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, took a walk, and walked and walked, so in such a case, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle shall not drive the motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol. There is a crosswalk where a signal, etc. is installed in the front section, and thus, there was a duty of care to check whether there is a person who gets to reduce the speed and to check the front section well, and to safely drive the motor vehicle according to the traffic signal and prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was negligent in driving a bicycle on the vehicle stop signal while putting the bicycle on the road along the crosswalk in accordance with the pedestrian signals and got the victim E (V, 73 years old) into the front part of the said car and let the victim go beyond the ground.

After all, the Defendant driven a car in a state where normal driving is difficult due to influence of drinking, and suffered approximately two weeks of medical treatment from the victim.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act;

arrow