logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.04.24 2018고정2
근로자퇴직급여보장법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is the actual manager of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C, who runs a manufacturing business using three full-time workers.

When a worker dies or retires, the employer shall pay the wages, compensations, and all other money and valuables within fourteen days after the cause for such payment occurred.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not pay KRW 7,523,760 of D's retirement pay that he/she retired from the above workplace from office from October 1, 2002 to April 4, 2017 within 14 days from the date of retirement without an agreement between the parties on the extension of payment deadline.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable law: Article 44 subparagraph 1 of the Guarantee of Retirement Benefits of Workers, and Article 9 of the same Act;

(b) Crimes of non-violation of will: The proviso to Article 44 of the Guarantee of Retirement Benefits of Workers;

C. Declaration of intent that D Workers of the Navy does not want to punish the Defendant ( April 13, 2018)

(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow