Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 200,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On March 24, 2013, around 14:30 on March 24, 2013, the Defendant inflicted an injury on a fluoral salt, etc., which requires approximately two weeks of treatment on the part of the victim, by putting the fluor E (ma, 63 years of age) away from the D cafeteria located in Daejeon Seo-gu C.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G in part;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant's assertion on the provisional payment order under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act asserts that the defendant only met with the victim and that he did not breath.

In addition to the F and G's respective legal statements to the effect that when the defendant and the victim have left a restaurant in the victim's statement content and statement attitude, the victim's statement is credibility.

The victim stated that “the defendant did not have any way in the vicinity of the victim’s flabage.” Since H, I, J, F, and G both appear to go out of the restaurant and to speak fighting, it is insufficient to reject the credibility of the victim’s statement solely on the basis of the victim’s statements in their respective legal and investigative agencies and each confirmation document in the J and I’s preparation that the defendant did not flab the victim’s flab, and each confirmation document in the J’s preparation.

(피고인이 제출한 녹취록에도 피고인과 피해자가 둘이서만 싸우던 도중 피해자가 ‘놔! 놔!’라고 소리를 질렀고, 그 이후에 I, J, K I는 법정에서 자신이 혼자 피고인의 머리채를 잡고 있는 피해자의 손을 떼어냈다고 진술하였으나, 피고인이 제출한 녹취록에 따르면, I와 K이 함께 피해자의 손을 떼어낸 것으로 보인다. 이 나와서 말린 것을 알 수 있다). 양형의 이유 피고인이 피해자로부터 맞던 중 범행한 것으로 경위에 참작할...