The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

On October 26, 2015, at around 20:55, the Defendant: (a) committed an assault to check the facts by police officers E, F, and G, etc. belonging to the Hacheon-gun, Chungcheongnamcheon-gun, the Defendant’s residence; (b) on October 26, 2015, at around 101, 701, the Defendant reported that the Defendant destroyed the water, and thereby interfered with the Defendant’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of order by assaulting the police officers, such as: (c) her police officers, F, and G, etc., who were called out after having received a report that the water would be destroyed; and (d) her police officers, etc., who were called up, check the facts.

Judgment

1. In full view of the evidence duly admitted and examined, the following facts can be recognized.

A. The Defendant was suspected of assaulting her mother on October 26, 2015 and was investigated by the police from October 20, 2015 to October 20, 2010, and went together with her mother to 101, 701, 100,000.

B. Although the Defendant demanded the mother to open an entrance by posting a telephone, the mother of the Defendant refused to do so, the Defendant, who rejected the entrance, was set up as a parking lot for the first floor in which the entrance was set up at the door and received from the visitors.

(c)

The mother reported that a small punishment of the defendant who was contacted by the mother of the defendant is damaging the property in the police.

(d)

The defendant was sent only to the police in the parking lot, and the police was "h" to the defendant.

In the purport of “the handling of the criminal”, why is one’s speech, and with a prior dog, whether or not the handling of the criminal

(1) A notice was given to that effect, and the notice was sent to the house to verify the fact of the report.

E. We confirmed that the Defendant’s mother did not open the password, and the police could enter the password by phone, and that the police confirmed the house, but did not destroy it.

F. The Defendant, entering the house, listens only to the police and handles him as a criminal.