The punishment against the Defendants shall be five months by imprisonment.

However, each of the above punishments for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

From June 2014, the Defendants: (a) purchased the intention from the victim D on several occasions; (b) obtained trust from the victim by fully paying the price; and (c) subsequently, conspired to not pay the price for one’s own debt even though the Defendants purchased the intention to purchase it on several occasions, the Defendants conspired to avoid paying the price for one’s own debt, not on the premise that the intention to purchase it was a good, even though it was a general intention that was not on the premise that the intention to purchase it was a good.

1. On November 12, 2014, the Defendants made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendants would make a later payment of money on the face of the victim” at the victim’s home located in Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, and at the victim’s home, at around November 12, 2014.

However, in fact, the Defendants did not intend to pay one’s own price even because they planned not to pay one’s own price normally with the face-to-face of the doping as above.

Nevertheless, the Defendants deceptioned the victim as above and acquired the victim by delivering 70,000 won of the market price from the injured party, which is equivalent to 27,700,000 won.

2. On December 2014, the Defendants made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendants would first bring the Dog and later bring money to the Dog in return for the purchase of the Dog 2 points from the injured party at the victim’s house in the middle of December 2014, as well as at the victim’s house in the middle of December 2014.”

However, in fact, the Defendants did not intend to pay their own price even because they planned not to pay their own price normally as above.

Nevertheless, the Defendants deceptioned the victim as above, and acquired the victim with the delivery of 20 million won in total from the victim to the victim, of 5 million won in total.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The statement concerning the Defendants in part of each protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects by the prosecution

1. Partial statement of the witness D;

1. D. D.