1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part concerning the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants on December 27, 2010 is as follows.

1. The scope of this Court’s adjudication against the Defendants and co-defendants of the first instance court. The first instance court dismissed the Plaintiff’s claim regarding the Plaintiff’s accident on December 27, 2010 among the instant lawsuit, and accepted the remainder of the Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant A and the claim against the co-defendants of the first instance court.

In this regard, the plaintiff filed an appeal against the defendants of the plaintiff who was dismissed in the judgment of the court of first instance only against the above part of the claim. Thus, the subject of the judgment of this court is limited to the claim related to the plaintiff's accident of December 27, 2010 against the defendants.

2. Facts of recognition;

A. 1) On May 31, 2010, Defendant A entered into an insurance contract with the Plaintiff as the insured on May 31, 2010, Defendant A with the content of “the fine for self-employed driver [excluding drinking, non-license, and escape where a fine has been determined due to an accident resulting from physical injury to another person due to an accident in the course of driving a self-managed motor vehicle], expenses for defense for self-employed driver (excluding drinking, non-license, and escape) by the Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (excluding drinking, non-license, and escape)], traffic accident consolation money [excluding payment (excluding drinking, non-license, and escape) where it was received as a traffic accident at the competent police station due to an accident in the course of driving a self-managed motor vehicle], and payment of the insurance benefits from a non-commercial traffic accident consolation money (excluding drinking, non-license, and escape) for which the insurance period from 104 (V) to 301 to 501” (hereinafter “insurance Period”).

(2) On September 9, 2010, Defendant A, the insured on the basis of Defendant A, “I, vs II, I, I, I, I, I, I, and I,” and “one life-insured limited driving/man, I, I, and I, respectively.”