1. The Defendants are to the extent of the property inherited from the network I, within the scope of the property:

A. Each of the Plaintiff A’s KRW 1,081,433 and this.

1. Where the purport of the entire pleadings is added to Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 8 and Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 4, the plaintiff A supplied eggs to I from January 4, 2016 to June 28, 2016; the unpaid amount was 3,244,300; the plaintiff B supplied materials to I from March 2, 2016 to June 28, 2016; the unpaid amount was 28,953,430; the amount was 28,953,430; the plaintiff C supplied materials and materials to I from January 29, 2016 to June 29, 2016; the defendants were 34,53,939; and the defendants supplied materials and materials to I from June 29, 2016 to June 20, 2016 to June 16, 2016; and the defendants were 30,616.6.

According to the above facts, the Defendants, as the deceased’s heir, are KRW 1,081,43 won (=3,244,300 x less than KRW 1/3,00 x less than KRW) to the Plaintiff, respectively, KRW 9,651,143 (==28,953,430 x less than KRW 1/3,00) to the Plaintiff, respectively, KRW 11,517,979 (=34,553,939 x less than KRW 1/3,00) to the Plaintiff, respectively, KRW 2,974,693 (=8,924,00 x less than KRW 1/3,00 x less than KRW 1/3,00) to the Plaintiff, and the Defendants are obligated to pay damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum 27, 2016 to the Defendants, who were the copies of the instant complaint.

The Defendants asserted that the amount of claims filed by the Plaintiffs is not acceptable, since it is not proved by the acceptance certificate or written confirmation, etc., but it is against the facts acknowledged earlier.