A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

On August 22, 2015, the Defendant, around 23:00, became aware of the birth of the son in Yongcheon-si P, Q, and inflicted injury on the victim’s face on the ground that the victim R (23 years old) who used the drinking place, expressed the son’s desire to his her her her son, which is a dangerous thing in the place, brought about once the victim’s son, and then, when the victim was aware of the son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Statement made by the police in the statement of the R;

1. Application of respective Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a medical certificate of injury, a criminal investigation report (on-site photographs submitted by the victim), a criminal investigation report ( telephone conversations between the witness S), a suspected person used for committing an offense, and a criminal investigation report, or application of video-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of small amount of punishment (see, e.g., favorable sentencing conditions among the following reasons for sentencing) is that the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the defendant, considering the fact that the defendant was punished four times for the same kind of crime, and that the victim was injured by getting the victim from his/her wire system as well as his/her face to the extent that he/she could not receive a letter from the injured party on the instant case, and that the damage recovery has not been properly performed (in spite of payment of KRW 11 million by agreement through criminal conciliation, he/she failed to perform it properly).

However, the defendant is deemed to have caused the crime of this case by hearing the defendant's desire for the person who is the defendant's will, and the defendant deposited five million won for the victim, and the defendant.