Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A around 17:00 on September 9, 201, at the house room located in Heak-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Cheongju-si, and at the victim E, “If a large number of women were to get money, it was taken by dividing the money, and the margin is cut down,” and the victim was called “if he was to get money, he was to get money,” and the victim was suffering from the injury of the victim, such as a multi-faced dives of the treatment days, by making it possible for the victim to have his face at several times due to drinking.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes (Evidence Nos 1-1);

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On September 6, 201, at around 15:05, Defendant A called “B (alias: G) on a cell phone, and damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts to the effect that “the victim’s reputation is “the victim is not different from another woman, and the wind is winded,” although there was no fact that the victim E was winded on the sexual side of the Cheongju-si located in a considerable area of Cheongju-ri.”

B. At around 15:05 on September 6, 201, Defendant B: (a) received a cell phone call from the Defendant’s home located in Heungdong-gu, Cheongju-si, that “The victim E is not different from another woman, and is winding; hereinafter the same shall apply); and (b) damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false information by openly pointing out the victim’s words “the winding.” to F (H) at the next end.

2. As to the facts charged in this part of the judgment, F’s legal statement and investigative agency’s statement and I’s investigative agency’s statement are admissible as evidence submitted by the prosecutor.

The defendants stated that they did not speak that they have the wind of E, and the F is also in the court from the investigative agency.