All appeals by the Defendants and the Prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In light of the overall circumstances of the Defendants, the sentence imposed by the lower court (one year and two months of imprisonment; eight months of imprisonment; two years of suspended execution; and three million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

B. In light of the overall circumstances of the Prosecutor’s instant case, the sentence imposed by the lower court to Defendant A is too unfasible and unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. We also examine the defendant A and the prosecutor's assertion.

Although there are favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendant made a confession of all the crimes of this case and made it contrary to the fact that her mother school expenses were to be considered on the ground that the Defendant committed the crime of this case, the crime of this case is likely to be considered on the grounds that it was committed. However, the Defendant’s act of operating an illegal game room business with considerable facilities, which is in need of strict punishment for social harm, such as encouraging a general public’s spirit of gambling and failure to commit home economy. In the event that the Defendant is under control, the Defendant was present at an investigative agency in the manner of carrying out the so-called branch office to be investigated, thereby obstructing the criminal investigation agency’s arrest of the offender, etc., and obstructed the criminal investigation agency’s criminal act. While the crime was discovered, he was committed on the ground that his branch office was replaced, and the Defendant continued to commit the same crime, and the Defendant was sentenced to a fine under the Game Industry Promotion Act, and all other Defendant’s age, family relation, criminal records, character and conduct, environment, means and method of the crime, and circumstances after the crime.

B. Defendant C led to the confession and reflect of the instant crime.