1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

3. The judgment of the court of first instance is ordered.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal of the judgment of the court of first instance or the addition of the defendant's new arguments in this court, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of

According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court of first instance, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justifiable). 2. higher portion of the judgment of the court of first instance from 20 to 3. 2.

A. Defendant and G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G”).

(2) On August 23, 2016, the Plaintiff entered into a gold supply contract with the contract amount of KRW 338,500,000 for the gold model of the OS/CK as well as a gold supply contract with the contract amount of KRW 338,50,000 for the gold model (hereinafter “instant contract”).

(1) Article 18(1) of the former Enforcement Decree of the Act provides that “The term “the term “the term “the term “the term “the term” means “the term “the term “the term” means “the term “the term “the term “the term” under which the term “the term “the term” under Article 15(1) of the former Enforcement Decree of the Act means the term “the term “the term “the term “the term” under Article 15(1) of the former Enforcement Decree of the Act, and the term “the term “the term “the term “the term “the term” under Article 15(1) of the former Enforcement Decree” under the term “the term “the term “the term “the term “the term” under Article 15(1) of the former Enforcement Decree” under the term

From 6th of the first instance judgment to 18th of the first instance judgment, the following shall be followed:

However, at the time of March 9, 2018 when the notification of the transfer of the plaintiffs was delivered to the defendant, the above fact alone had already occurred damages claim equivalent to the costs of the punishment for breach of the defendant's obligation to return gold plans and processed data, etc.

In the event that an agreement or G simultaneously executes the payment of the price under the instant contract and the submission of drawings, processing data, etc. on the whole gold-type supplied by G to the Defendant by the Defendant or G violates the obligation to deliver the above gold-type drawings, processing data, etc. to the Defendant, the Defendant shall pay damages, such as re-production costs.