The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the factual errors and misapprehension of the legal principles) is that the defendant posted on the Internet or posted in the printed material, and that there was no purpose of slandering the public interest as it was aimed at correcting the corruption of this Chapter D to the outside.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the defendant purchased the land F in Gangwon-do and its ground house from E on March 24, 2005 and resided in the above D around that time. ② After purchasing the above house, the defendant came to know that part of the above F F F F F F F F F F F F F land was incorporated into the road or invaded neighboring land, and the defendant was later aware of the fact that the victim, who was a village head involved in the process of the sales contract, got involved in the transaction of the above F F F land, and ③ The defendant argued that the victim conspired with E in collusion with the above E, thereby deceiving the defendant as fraud, such as hiding the fact that the land was incorporated into the road in the course of the sale and purchase of the above F F F land, and accordingly, the defendant was accused of the crime of fraud. ④ From around 2008, the defendant made a false judgment on April 4, 2008 to the residents of Gangwon-do District District Court to recognize the violation of the Act on Promotion, etc. of 16.

In light of the above facts of recognition, the contents of the writing either posted or distributed by the defendant cannot be deemed to be true, and there is no evidence to acknowledge the victim's manipulation of official documents or the acquisition of fraudulent gains, etc., which are alleged by the defendant, and it is reasonable to believe that the defendant is true.