Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Records] On April 11, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for habitual special larceny, etc. at the Seoul Northern District Court (Seoul Northern District Court) and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 18, 2018.
[2] On September 3, 2017, the Defendant of the 2018 High 702, the Defendant stated to the effect that “Ashe is hospitalized in Ashea hospital, but the hospital cost is required to be paid in advance at the Chinese house where the complainant works in advance.”
However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the debt amounting to KRW 2.4 million in the restaurant that he worked before the time, even if he was paid the debt amounting to KRW 2.4 million in advance from the injured party.
The defendant deceivings the victim as above and was delivered KRW 500,000 to the victim on the same day.
The Defendant, from March 2017, 2017, worked as the delivery source in the “G” operated by the victim F of the victim F on the 1st floor E and 1st floor from the Government of the Republic of Korea.
1. From that time to July 2017, the Defendant, despite having no intent or ability to repay money from the injured party even if he/she borrowed money from the injured party, the Defendant made a false statement stating that “The Defendant borrowed money from the injured party while working,” and received a total of KRW 1,680,000 from the injured party on several occasions.
2. On August 6, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim on August 6, 2017 that “Notwithstanding the fact that the victim has no intention or ability to continue to work at the restaurant of the victimized person, and the victim has no intent or ability to repay the borrowed money, the Defendant stated that “I will continue to work in good faith in the future” to the victim, and that it is clearly corrected because it is a clerical error, although it is written in the indictment as stated in the record.
(2).