logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.09.20 2018구합63051
등급분류거부처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On July 21, 2017, the Plaintiff, a company producing ice-related game products, filed an application for the classification of “B” game products (hereinafter “instant game products”) with respect to “C” (hereinafter “C”) as “not permitted to use all as a whole.” On February 23, 2018, the Plaintiff filed an application for the classification with respect to each of the instant game products (hereinafter “each of the instant game products”) as “not permitted to use as a youth.”

B. On February 1, 2018, on April 19, 2018, the Defendant rendered a decision to refuse the rating classification of the instant C Game Products (hereinafter “instant disposition”). The Defendant’s grounds for refusing the rating classification of each of the instant game products are as follows.

The game of this case - The game of this case - The game of this case is a game product in the form of determination of the result according to the snow of injection, and the acquisition of free gifts which are a result of the game using an external device, regardless of user capacity, is confirmed by using an external device. Thus, the plaintiff's refusal to classify "the person who applied for rating by fraud or other improper means or who applied for rating in respect of the game product falling under speculative game products" pursuant to Article 22 (2) of the Game Industry Promotion Act is determined as "the person who applied for rating by fraud or other improper means". The method of completing ice ice lacing after entering the game of this case - the game of this case - the game of this case lacing machine after entering the ice lac is determined as falling under the lacian yarn, which is a speculative machine. Thus, the plaintiff is determined as "the person who applied for rating classification of the act or machine subject to regulation or punishment pursuant to other Acts, such as the Act on Special Cases Concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, etc."

arrow