1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff, which orders payment below, shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing this case is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing this case is identical to that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except in the following cases or addition.

The 4th to 18th parallels in the judgment of the first instance shall be followed as follows.

“4) With respect to the instant breach of trust, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year for the crime of occupational breach of trust on July 12, 2017 (U.S. District Court Decision 2016Kadan2449). The Defendant appealed, but was dismissed on October 30, 2017 (the grounds for recognition) but the final appeal was withdrawn and confirmed around that time (the Military Court Decision 2017No5386). [The grounds for recognition] Items A through 7, 9 through 13, 20, 21 evidence (including a serial number if any), and the purport of the entire argument and the entire argument were as follows.

A. The Plaintiff asserts as follows: (i) The amount of damages caused by the decline in sales amount due to the Plaintiff’s act of breach of trust in this case is calculated as to the calculation of the amount of damages or profits lost due to the Plaintiff’s decrease in sales amount; (ii) the sales amount of KRW 3,348,439,00, out of the Defendant’s total sales amount of KRW 3,804,29 through C in 2008 and the total sales amount of KRW 3,804,29,298,000, which is equivalent to 88% of the total sales amount of KRW 3,348,439,000, and the sales amount of KRW 27,218,015,288. Accordingly, the sales amount achieved by the Defendant through the Defendant’s act of breach of trust in this case is equivalent to KRW 30.5 billion, the total sales amount of KRW 30.5 billion from the above 30.5 billion amount, multiplied by the estimated profit rate of KRW 20.30.5 billion.