The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, the court below found the defendant guilty of the crime of special assault, which affected the conclusion of the judgment, although it could be sufficiently recognized that the defendant intentionally committed an assault by allowing the victim to take the vehicle of the defendant, in view of the evidence submitted by the prosecutor.

2. Determination

가. 공소사실 피고인은 2014. 11. 23. 17:30경 이천시 마장면 소재 덕평IC 진입 도로상에서 D 산타페 차량을 운행하며 피해자 E(40세, 남)가 운행하는 F 렉스턴 차량 앞으로 끼어들기를 하였고, 이에 피해자가 상향등을 깜박이며 항의를 했다는 이유로 위험한 물건인 산타페 차량을 급정거하여 미쳐 제동을 하지 못한 피해자가 후면부를 충격하게 하는 방법으로 폭행하였다.

B. In light of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the prosecutor’s evidence, the lower court determined that the Defendant was acquitted on the charges of special assault on the ground that it is difficult to view that the mere evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone, which was presented by the prosecutor, was an intentional act of assaulting the victim by taking the boom vehicle immediately before the collision with the victim, cannot be deemed to have been proven without any reasonable doubt.

1 검사가 제출한 증거들에 의하면, 피고인은 피해 차량 앞으로 끼어들기를 하면서 미안하다는 표시로 비상등을 깜박인 사실을 인정할 수 있고, 피해자는 항의의 표시로 경적을 울리고 톨게이트 방향으로 좌회전을 마친 후 피고인이 운전한 차량을 향해 상향등을 켠 사실을 인정할 수 있다.

The defendant is at the entrance of the access road to Tol, under the circumstance that the defendant showed that the defendant was not able to make a light while showing that the defendant was blick.