logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 공주지원 2015.06.19 2015고단101
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On December 2, 2002, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) in the Hongsung Branch of the Daejeon District Court on January 2006, the summary order of KRW 700,000 for a fine as the same crime in the Daejeon District Court Seosan Branch of the Daejeon District Court on January 20, 2006, the summary order of KRW 1 million for a fine at the Cheongju District Court on June 24, 2013, the summary order of KRW 30,000 for a violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act from the official state branch of the Daejeon District Court on October 2, 2013, and the summary order of KRW 3 million for a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) on January 6, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around 08:20 on March 31, 2015, the Defendant was driving D Hyundai 9.5 tons of cargo vehicles without a vehicle driver’s license in a section of about 4 km from the front of the Monok Center located in the Mandong-gu, Cheongju-si to the national highways B, which was located in C. 23 meters prior to the national highways.

2. No motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall be operated on a road;

Nevertheless, the Defendant driven the above cargo possessed by the Defendant at the same time and place as above.

Accordingly, the defendant operated a motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance.

3. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person driving the foregoing cargo vehicle.

On March 31, 2015, the Defendant operated the above cargo vehicle around 08:20, and changed the car line while driving the national highways No. C. 23 in the official city B along the two-lanes from the official direction to the tent.

When changing the vehicle line, there was a duty of care to change the vehicle line by operating the direction direction, etc., giving notice of the course, and taking into account the traffic situation of the front and rear.

Nevertheless, the defendant is neglected to do so without a driver's license.

arrow