1. The Defendant’s KRW 13,00,000 as well as 5% per annum from August 8, 2014 to July 15, 2016 to the Plaintiff.

1.The following facts of recognition may be found either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the overall purport of the pleadings at Gap evidence 1 to 14, Eul evidence 1 (including branch numbers), and videos as stated in Gap evidence 1 to 1.

The plaintiff is a teacher of Chigh School in Namyang-si, Namyang-si, and the defendant is in a de facto marital relationship with D from about 15 years.

B. The Defendant, including the Defendant’s act of revolving money against the Plaintiff, thought that the Plaintiff and D were in in inhuman relations with the Plaintiff. On April 14, 2014, the Plaintiff found the husband of the Plaintiff residing in Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun and then became aware of the Plaintiff’s current public educational official status, and that D and the Plaintiff did not pay KRW 10 million out of KRW 30 million on their cell phones around April 13, 2014, on the ground that “A person who is subject to a disposition of non-honorary dismissal from his/her cell phone from his/her cell phone “I have been subject to a disposition of dismissal from his/her cell phone from his/her cell phone “I have become aware of the fact that he/she would have raised to his/her school until it?” around 11:21 on the same day, “I have finished at around 10:43 on the 14th day of the same month, but will have to receive KRW 30 million on the 300 million.”

4. From 10:04 on 15.10:04, “Age of the aged and the elderly have been at the school,” the words “the elderly and the elderly have been transmitted to the Plaintiff’s mobile phone and frighted.

The Defendant, as above, by threatening the Plaintiff, received KRW 10 million from the Plaintiff drinking, around May 2, 2014, at around 19:37, from the Plaintiff, and 10 million won in his agricultural bank account (E).

C. The Defendant was charged with the above criminal act and was sentenced to a fine of two million won on June 2, 2016 (No. 2015DaMa7773). The Defendant’s criminal punishment against the Defendant is pending in the judgment (the above court No. 2016No1408) by filing an appeal against the aforementioned criminal act (No. 2016No1408).

2. Scope of damages.

A. According to the facts of the recognition of property damage, the Plaintiff suffered property damage equivalent to KRW 10 million, which was derived from the Defendant.

I would like to say.

The defendant demanded the plaintiff to pay the above money.