1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

The Plaintiff as the party to the instant decision was established on April 16, 1987 and operated transportation business using more than 250 full-time workers. On May 1, 2009, the Intervenor was employed by the Plaintiff and served as a taxi driver on May 1, 2009, and was voluntarily retired on August 31, 2013, but was re-exploed on October 17, 2013 and was engaged in the same business.

The Plaintiff was subject to the instant disciplinary action against the Intervenor on March 20, 2014, following the resolution of the Monetary Punishment Committee, and based on the following grounds and grounds, the Intervenor was suspended from office for two months.

3. Failure to comply with the report system of traffic accidents and absence from office without permission (hereinafter “Disciplinary Reason 2”) 4. Article 14, 26(5), (11), (17), 28(8), and 41(1) of the Collective Agreement (hereinafter “Disciplinary Reason 5”), which states that the Plaintiff’s application for remedy against the Plaintiff’s unfair disciplinary action under Article 18 subparag. 1, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 10, 29, 41, and 52 subparag. 1, 46 of the Labor Relations Commission (“Disciplinary Reason 5”) was dismissed on the ground that the Plaintiff’s application for remedy against the Plaintiff’s unlawful disciplinary action under subparag. 1, 206, subparag. 2, 300, No. 41, and No. 51, No. 41, and No.

On June 5, 2014, the National Labor Relations Commission filed an application for review with the National Labor Relations Commission on June 5, 2014, against the aforementioned initial inquiry tribunal, and the National Labor Relations Commission.