logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.04.09 2014고단143
특수공용물건손상
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 01:20 on January 12, 2014, the Defendant damaged goods used by public offices by destroying a suspect waiting person, who is placed in the above police box, in a dangerous article, which is a dangerous article prepared in advance to avoid and have a disturbance, using a knife (6 cm in length on a day-to-day) with the tear-to-face (6 cm in length), which is a dangerous article that had been prepared in advance, under the influence of alcohol.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Police investigation report (CCTV image);

1. Written estimate;

1. The application of photographic pictures, protogram photographs for the suspect, and photographs at the time of committing the crime;

1. Relevant legal provisions on criminal facts, Articles 144(1) and 141(1) of the Criminal Act on the choice of punishment, the reason for sentencing of imprisonment [decision of type] : Invalidity of public property [Special Convict] - Aggravation of the obstruction of performance of official duties as to the obstruction of performance of official duties: In the case of carrying dangerous articles [decision of the recommended area] / [Scope of punishment] 1 to 4 years [Scope of sentenced punishment] / 10 months from 1 to 10 years [ extent of sentenced punishment] - where dangerous articles are carried - Where dangerous articles are carried - there is no effort to recover damage - there is no positive general reference reason - The defendant committed a crime subject to punishment as a crime of destruction of property similar to the crime of this case on several occasions, and in particular, the defendant committed a crime under one-year suspended sentence after being sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime in the district court on September 20, 2012, and committed a crime under one-year term of probation.

However, the Defendant committed the instant crime, under the influence of alcohol, is deemed to have committed the rest of the Defendant who lost her gender.

arrow