1.The judgment of the first instance, including the claims modified by this Court, shall be modified as follows:

The defendant is the plaintiff.

1. The reasoning for this part of this Court’s reasoning is as stated in Paragraph 1 of the judgment of the first instance, except for the modification of part of the judgment of the first instance as follows. Thus, this part of the reasoning is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(hereinafter the terms used in this case are the same as the judgment of the court of first instance). The third-party first-class "Director" shall be added to "the Director" and the second-class 4 shall be deleted.

The third and third parallel " July 11, 2017" are used as " July 11, 2015", and the second and twenty to twenty-21 letter "the arrival of the first place in the J Hospital has arrived at the first place in the J Hospital" shall be read as "the first place in the J Hospital has received medical treatment from the outpatient to the J Hospital."

Part 6 of the 12th page "B 1 to 4" shall be written with "B 1 to 4 and 6."

2. Determination as to the plaintiffs' claims

A. The gist of the plaintiffs' assertion is that the court stated this part of this part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance.

Since it is the same as the statement in the claim, it is quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

B. Whether there was negligence that caused one infection of the liability for damages, the reasons for this part of this court’s judgment is set forth by Article 3 among the reasons for the judgment of the first instance court.

A. 1) Since it is identical to the statement in paragraph 1, it is cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. 2) Whether there was negligence due to delay in the failure to cope with all and copes, the reasons for this part of the court below’s decision are as follows, and Article 3 of the reasons for the judgment of the court

A. 2) Inasmuch as it is identical to the statement in Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the same Act. The following is added to the first sentence of the first sentence of the said 9th. “F” The personnel and facility standards of a postnatal care center in [Attachment 2] of the former Enforcement Rule of the Mother and Child Health Act (amended by Ordinance of the Ministry of Health and Welfare No. 406, Jun. 23, 2016) applied at the time of being hospitalized in the