Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000,000,000,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are the same workplace pay.

On April 28, 2017, at around 23:30 around 23:30, the Defendants heard the phrase “E” restaurant operated by Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C Victim D (son, 34 years old) that Defendant A first saw, Defendant A her drinking in the above restaurant, and her mari was so withdrawn, and Defendant A should sell her drinking to the victim.

n. The president shall be the president.

C. The Defendant B, who entered a restaurant, made verbal languages, such as “I am unable to take funeral here,” was “I am unable to take all as soon as possible,” and the victim called Defendant B “I am in this part and only I am you am. I am to see. I am to see. I am to see I am. I am. I am. I am. I am to am to see I am. I am to am. I am to am. I am to am. I am to am. I am to am. I am to am? I am to am. I am to am. I am to am. I am to am. I am to am. I am to am?

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force between about 20 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (on-site CCTV verification);

1. The Defendants: Articles 314(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act; and Articles 314(1) and 30 of the same Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The part dismissing the public prosecution under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Defendant A)

1. On April 28, 2017, the Defendant assaulted the victim on a one-time basis, such as when the victim’s chest was her chest, on the ground that the victim’s c victim D (son, 34 years old) was born at the “E” restaurant operated by Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (Seoul, the 34 years old) and was boomed with the victim’s bath and test, on the ground that the victim was bad.

2. The facts charged in the instant case constitute Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act.