logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2018.11.21 2018고단180
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(운전자폭행등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months of imprisonment for fraud in the Western Branch of the Daegu District Court on August 16, 2017 and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on the 24th of the same month. The judgment becomes final and conclusive on the 24th of the same month.

[2] On December 3, 2017, the Defendant: (a) boarded the victim C (57 tax) in front of the Daegu-si Station located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-si; (b) and (c) went through the Multi-Eup Office and the Daejeon-si Office and the next day to December 4, 2017, and arrived at the front of the branch office of the Multi-Eup Office in the Dag-si located in the Si-si, Daegu-si, the purpose of which is around 00:01, the next day.

The defendant is the victim who received a demand from the injured person to pay 60,000 won for taxi expenses. "Choe, Shoe, Shoe."

The expression "" et al. al., the victim's left side part was flicked once and flicked with flick hand.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim who is a driver of a vehicle in operation.

The defendant was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for six months in the Western District Court on August 16, 2017, and on August 24, 2017, the judgment becomes final and conclusive on August 24, 2017.

[Criminal Facts]

1. On February 14, 2018, at a restaurant operated by the Victim F in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, the Defendant ordered the victim to provide alcohol and alcohol to the victim.

However, at the time of fact, there was no money owned by the Defendant, and there was no other means of payment such as credit cards, and there was no certain occupation, and income was also limited to KRW 20,000 per month, so there was no intention or ability to pay the price even if he received an order for drinking or food.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received a delivery from the victim of alcoholic beverages and a share of 12,00 won in total at the market price.

2. When the victim F demanded payment from the victim F at the same time and place as above 1, the Defendant’s interference with the business, saying, “slick, d., d.” to the restaurant customers.

arrow