beta
Text
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.
Reasons
Public Prosecutor's Office
1. From around 10:00 on September 27, 201 to around 15:00 on the same day, the Defendant, when the victim had come to the house of the victim C301 of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “C301”) and had his house infringed upon the victim’s residence by entering the said house with the victim’s intent to steal the documents, etc. being kept by the victim during the outing period.
2. Larceny;
A. On September 27, 2011, the thief Defendant stated “E” in the date and time, place, the articles of incorporation of each corporation owned by the victim E and the victim FF corporation, and the victim G indictment, which appears to be a clerical error in the “U”.
On January 3, 2002, the certificate of the articles of incorporation of a corporation (No. 832 of 97), the law firm's certificate of completion of a bill (the date of June 9, 2009), the minutes of the board of directors' meeting, the minutes of the victim E-stock company, the victim E-stock company's Han Bank passbook (H), the Industrial Bank of Korea passbook, the community credit cooperative passbook (K), the national bank passbook (L), the new bank passbook (M), and the above passbooks, the personal seal impression in the victim N, the victim's personal seal impression in the victim's name, the victim's personal seal impression and seal impression in the victim's name, the victim's personal seal impression and seal impression in the victim's name, the real estate sale contract on the No. 303 of Eunpyeong Q apartment 303 on October 30, 2005, the victim E- stock purchase and sale contract owned by the victim E-stock company, the judgment of the court below held on August 27, 20069
B. On August 31, 2012, at around 14:00 on August 31, 2012, the Defendant was investigated with the Defendant at the Economic Team Office of the Seoul Western Police Station located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, Seoul, and around 177, the investigator in charge is also the head of the victim R (owner), one corporate director of the victim E (owner), one corporate director of the victim E (owner), and the head of the victim G (owner).