beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 21,214,929 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from January 1, 2015 to January 12, 2017, and the following.
Reasons
1. Determination as to the cause of claim
A. 1) The Plaintiff is a stock company C on November 4, 201 (hereinafter “C”).
(2) On March 27, 2012, C entered into a contract to sell the power generator to be installed at the construction site at the construction site at the construction site at the construction site at the construction site at the construction site at the construction site and completed the supply on November 20, 201. C did not pay the remainder after paying KRW 27,00,000 out of the price of the goods on March 27, 2012. (2) The Plaintiff won the lawsuit against C seeking payment of KRW 43,400,000 for the remainder of the goods (C District Court 2012Da43160), and C appealed appealed (C District Court 2014Na1093).
3) In the above appellate trial on May 12, 2014, the Defendant (referring to C) paid KRW 35,000,000 to the Plaintiff, and the remaining KRW 17,000,000 among them shall be paid up to August 31, 2014, each of the remainder of KRW 18,000,000 until November 30, 2014. If the Defendant delays each of the above payment dates at once, he/she shall lose the benefit of the deadline and immediately pay the unpaid amount in full, but the unpaid amount shall be paid in addition to the annual damages for delay at the rate of KRW 20,00 from the following day to the date of full payment (hereinafter “instant conciliation”).
4) The Plaintiff was ordered to seize and collect C’s claims against Gyeonggi-do with the instant conciliation protocol as executive title (Ycheon District Court Branch 2014TTTT 11660).
Since then, on December 19, 2014, the Plaintiff was paid part of the claims arising from the instant conciliation, and C prepared a letter stating that “the remainder of the claims arising from the instant conciliation shall be repaid on December 31, 2014,” and the Defendant jointly and severally guaranteed the said debt.
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 2, and 4 evidence of debt repayment, the defendant does not have any fact of signing and signing his name in each of the above documents as joint and several sureties, and there is no evidence to acknowledge that his name was forged, and the result of appraiser D's appraisal is followed.