logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.02.19 2013고단1420
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who engages in construction business.

(ju)E received and performed the remaining D Apartment Construction on land, such as Daejeon Seo-gu C, Daejeon, which was interrupted in the course of implementation and construction by the Natural Comprehensive Construction, around September 2005.

(E)In the position of the Defendant, the Defendant has all the powers and responsibilities, such as the selection of subcontractors and the payment of substitutes for the subsequent work and the on-site operation, in consultation with the State Natural Integration Construction, State EE, etc. on June 26, 2006.

As a result, the defendant paid out of the sales contract paid to the sub-contractor for the pre-sale cost, the responsibility of the pre-sale contract for the double-sale, the obligation of the buyer to recover the pre-sale contract for the household that the buyer demanded the cancellation of the contract, but the seller withdraws his intention of cancellation, and bears the responsibility to recover the sales contract for the household that recovered the status of the buyer through the sub-party corporation (F), and to replace the pre-sale to the pre-sale household.

The above D Apartment 704 paid the down payment of KRW 36,893,850 upon sale by G on November 3, 2003. On January 20, 2004, the first part payment of KRW 49,191,800 and the second part payment of KRW 49,191,800 on June 20, 2004 were paid in substitution for the part payment loan.

In addition, (State)F prepared a contract for sale with the natural person on May 18, 2006 for the preservation of G's rights, and (State) in order to preserve the claim for ownership transfer in the name of F, Daejeon District Court 2006Kahap1498 against the whole of the households sold including the above 704 units for the purpose of preserving the claim for ownership transfer in the name of F.

arrow