Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On March 11, 2014, the Defendant had the D Office of Attorney-at-law in Kunsan-si C prepare a false complaint against F.

A written complaint stating that "F, the accused on March 13, 201, forged one copy of a written agreement in the name of the complainant without the consent of A, the complainant, and submitted it to support military service and exercised it on June 2013, 201." The above written agreement was prepared by the defendant himself/herself, and therefore, F did not have any fact of forging or using the written agreement in the name of the defendant.

Nevertheless, on March 11, 2014, the Defendant submitted a false statement to the police officer who was unable to know his name with the intent to have F criminal punishment imposed by the police station in the Gosan-si.

In this respect, the defendant raised Flessness.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. Response to the request for appraisal;

1. Original of a written agreement;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning criminal records, copies of written judgments, and current status of personal identification and confinement;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 156 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 157, 153 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of confessions;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for sentencing of the defendant alleged that the document under the name of the defendant submitted by F as evidence in the civil procedure was forged, and that F interfered with the finding of substantial truth in the civil trial by committing the crime of forging private documents, etc., and that F interfered with the discovery of criminal facts and the responsibility for the crime of this case that caused F to pose a risk of criminal punishment, the defendant repeated the argument that F has forged a written agreement in the course of investigation and denied the crime, and the defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of the fact that F was committed while he was sentenced to criminal punishment in the course of criminal investigation.