A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a tenant of C-owned housing, and is in a de facto marital relationship with D.

On April 16, 2015, on the ground that the Defendant assaulted D in Jinju-si E on April 16, 2015, the Defendant was under investigation by the Jinju Police Station, and D was not returned to Korea, and was subject to emergency temporary measures such as prohibition of access from D, and was able to see whether he was a fire in multi-household housing in which he was residing.

On April 16, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around Jinju, on April 12:10, 2015,: E, the first floor, and the living room with gasoline rootsed gasoline; and (b) moved the fire to the floor area of 137.52 square meters of the total floor area of the second floor (137.52 square meters of the building, which is owned by C, to the floor of the living room.

As a result, the Defendant, who is a family member of C and D used as a residence, destroyed the housing unit of KRW 102,200,000 at the market price of C owned by C.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness F, G and H;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. On-site reports on the results of field identification, on the scene map of a fire, and on the fire photographs;

1. Legal and chemical appraisal report, appraisal report (1) and product appraisal result of a request for appraisal;

1. Investigation report (investigation of estimates submitted by the victim), public mission I, and investigation report (investigation of residents in the damaged place);

1. A general building ledger, details of inspection of occupying households (including liveers), and a certified copy of resident registration;

1. Application of the statutes governing the place of video treatment records;

1. Determination as to the assertion of the defendant and his/her defense counsel under the pertinent Article of the Criminal Act and Article 164(1) of the Criminal Act regarding the selection of criminal facts

1. The Defendant asserted that, around April 16, 2015:10: (a) 12: 10, in the house toilet as indicated in the judgment of the lower court, the Defendant made a fluoring the fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor to smoke in order to smoke tobacco; (b) was due to the fact that the fluor’s fluor’s fluor was put

2. Determination, the evidence duly examined, and the following circumstances recognized by the court, i.e., gasoline in the clothes in which the Defendant was suffering at the time of fire.