A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

No one shall sell alcoholic beverages that are drugs harmful to juveniles to juveniles.

Nevertheless, on January 2, 2015, at around 23:20, the Defendant sold at the D cafeteria operated by the Defendant on January 2, 2015, the amount equivalent to KRW 3 Byung (10,500), approximately KRW 5 Byung (5,000, KRW 2000, KRW 32,000, KRW 77,500, KRW 100, KRW 10,000, KRW 77,500, and KRW 77,00, and KRW 50.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Entry of the witness K, E, I, and G in the third public trial protocol;

1. Statement made by a witness in the fifth public trial records;

1. A copy of on-site photograph and an invoice;

1. A report on the business control of custom;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation;

1. The pertinent legal provisions on criminal facts and the indictment under Article 59 subparag. 6 of the Act on the Protection of Juveniles from which the punishment was selected are written as “Article 58 subparag. 3 of the Act on the Protection of Juveniles,” but appears to be a clerical error;

Article 28(1) and Selection of fines

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. As to the assertion of the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order, the Defendant and the defense counsel confirmed all the identification cards of the Defendant’s 4 juvenile of this case. At the time, they did not know that they were juveniles in possession of each adult (one person for whom 190 was 190, and three persons were 195 birth).

The argument is asserted.

Since the police, the instant juveniles consistently stated that “the Defendant did not verify only the identification card that K presented and the remaining three persons did not verify the identification card,” it is difficult to deem that their statements are credibility.

On the other hand, the testimony of the witness M, consistent with the defendant's above assertion, is as follows, the defendant presented the identification card of 1990s to the juvenile of this case, and the remaining three persons presented the identification card of 195.