1. The part against the defendant in the judgment of the first instance shall be revoked;

2. The plaintiff's claim against the defendant is dismissed.

3...

Basic Facts

On March 29, 2015, the insurer’s liability of the company for booming vehicles caused an accident (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”) that caused the booming booming car installed in the above vehicle to a high voltage line, and caused the booming booming the F, which passed on the wind where the object was removed, while the booming booming price installed in the above vehicle was at a high voltage line, and the booming booming booming with the object.

In the instant accident, F suffered injury, such as minculation in the left-hand flasium, 3 or more mid-to-side flasing in the upper-hand flas, etc.

As to the instant vehicle, the Defendant entered into an automobile insurance contract with H and the insured, a telegraph of the G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G”), with respect to which the term of insurance from January 6, 2015 to January 6, 2016, the term of insurance was stipulated under a special agreement for driving at least 26 years of age (hereinafter “the insurance of the instant vehicle”).

C As a result of a violation of the “working at least 26 years old” special terms on the insurance of the instant sea vehicle with the age of 19 years around the time of the instant accident, C was only guaranteed under liability insurance, not a comprehensive insurance, from the insurance of the foregoing sea vehicle.

The victim F of the instant accident entered into an automobile insurance contract with the Plaintiff from July 6, 2014 to July 6, 2015, including a non-insurance coverage special agreement. G also entered into an automobile insurance contract including a non-insurance coverage special agreement.

The F claimed compensation based on the motor vehicle insurance contract including the non-life insurance special agreement that he/she has subscribed to G after the accident, and G paid the F totaling KRW 78,346,350 to the F for medical expenses and damages, around 2015, and returned KRW 35,00,000, which is the amount equivalent to the liability insurance amount guaranteed by the insurance of the instant sea vehicle, to the G.

F = F

(b)such as paragraph (1), each non-insurance coverage agreement with the Plaintiff is included.