1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts were owned by Cheongdo-gun, Cheongdo-gun, J. J. 26 and K 655 square meters. Each of the above real estates was divided into J. J. 81 on March 7, 1938 and I reply 524 on March 9, 1938 and M 357 square meters, respectively.

However, the matters related to this are indicated on the land cadastre, but the registration of combination and subdivision has not been made.

The deceased L sold N on February 26, 1941 the JJ 226 square meters to N, and then completed the registration of ownership transfer as the receipt No. 2403 on May 1, 1941, the Daegu District Court Cheongdo Office of Cheongdo, which completed the registration of ownership transfer as the receipt No. 2403 on May 1, 1941. On the same day, after selling K 65 square meters to O, the registration of ownership transfer was completed as the receipt No. 2402 on the same date.

On January 5, 1950, the net P purchased 524/655 shares from the Cheongdo-gun, Cheongdo-gun, Cheongdo-gun, Cheongdo-do-si, 655 shares, and completed the registration of ownership transfer as the receipt No. 16354 on June 30, 1965.

On December 30, 1985, the Plaintiff’s father Q purchased 524/655 shares from R, which is the family heir of P, Cheongbuk-do, Cheongbuk-do. 655 shares of 524/65.

As a heir of net Q, the Plaintiff occupied and managed the land cadastre I 524 square meters (1732 square meters) and paid property tax thereon.

The defendants succeeded to the rights and obligations of the network L as the heir of the network L, such as the shares in the attached list.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 9 (including branch numbers if there are branch numbers), the purport of whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the registration of real estate on the register and on the register was inconsistent with the Plaintiff’s assertion in the process of subdivisions into JJ 226 and J Cheong-do Cheong-do Cheong-do 655 and JJ 881 and J J 524 and M. M. 357, respectively, and the registration of real estate on the register and on the register was omitted. Since the indication of real estate should be based on the register, the registration of real estate on the register and on the register should be cancelled, and since I reply 524 are subject to registration of ownership preservation as non-registered real estate, registration on the above real estate shall be cancelled.