logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.07.20 2016가단50281
대여금
Text

1. The defendant shall pay KRW 500,000 to the plaintiff.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

3.Paragraph 1.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. According to the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the plaintiff was appointed as trustee in bankruptcy of the Savings Bank (Seoul District Court No. 2005Da260150, hereinafter referred to as the "Seoul District Court") on February 16, 2006, and the above court rendered a judgment on February 16, 2006 that "the defendant shall pay to the Savings Bank 1,445,182,120 won to the Savings Bank" as stated in the grounds for claim. The new mutual savings and finance company established a loan contract with the defendant as shown in the attached Form No. 1. The Savings Bank succeeded to the status of the new mutual savings and finance company under the above loan contract. The Savings Bank filed a loan claim lawsuit against the defendant for the payment of the remaining principal and interest under the above loan contract (Seoul Central District Court No. 2005Da260150, hereinafter referred to as the "former District Court"), and it is acknowledged that the above judgment became final and conclusive around that time.

B. The Defendant is obligated to pay KRW 500,000,000 to the Plaintiff, as claimed by the Plaintiff, out of its principal and interest.

2. Judgment on the defendant's defense

A. The defendant asserts that the claim stated in the annexed sheet has expired by prescription.

B. The defendant's defense is without merit since it is apparent that the lawsuit in this case was filed before 10 years elapsed from the date the judgment in the previous suit in this case became final and conclusive.

3. Full acceptance of the Plaintiff’s claim

arrow