beta
Text
Defendant
A and B shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive against the Defendants.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. No person, other than the Seoul Olympic Sports Promotion Foundation or an entrusted business entity, shall issue sports promotion betting tickets or similar things (including issuance by means of information and communications networks) and provide property or property benefits (hereinafter referred to as “similar act”) to persons who win at the betting results of the Defendants’ joint criminal conduct (hereinafter referred to as “similar act”);
Nevertheless, E and F, etc. comprehensively operate “G”, which is a similar illegal gambling site to the sports soil, and Defendant A shall take charge of the management of funds deposited by the members of the above site. Defendant B shared their respective roles to take charge of overall sales management, etc. in the Republic of Korea. Defendant B acquired approximately KRW 390,360,67 from September 2, 2014 to October 5, 2015 by opening the above site at a place where it is impossible to identify the place and receiving Do money from many unspecified members of the above site and expected to suffer Do money by predicting the failure and differences in the points of the various sports games posted on the above site. Defendant A paid Do money by multiplying Do money transferred to the hostile members according to the actual results of the games by the dividend rate set in advance. Defendant B acquired approximately KRW 390,360,670 by means of collecting Do money remitted from members who did not receive Do money from members.
As a result, the Defendants, in collusion with the above E and F, issued similar things to sports betting tickets through information and communications networks, provided property to persons who win the betting tickets, and opened gambling for profit.
2. In using and managing the means of access (in violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act), no person may acquire the means of access, unless otherwise specifically provided for in other Acts and subordinate statutes.
In order to use G as the operational account, the defendant is a police officer and a Eup in the middle of March 2015.