logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.10.30 2014나13019
대여금 등
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. Reasons why the court shall explain this case in this case by the court of the first instance

1. The part of the basic facts is cut down as follows 2. The witness of the third, fourth, and fourth of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed to be a witness of the court of first instance; the court of first instance shall be deemed to be a witness of the court of first instance; the court of first instance shall be deemed to be a “court of the court of first instance”; the second, third, “this court shall be deemed to be a “court of the court of first instance”; and the third, third, third and nine shall be deemed to be only the contents of the third, seventh, 19 of the first, and the second, “the only person” shall be deemed to be the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of “C farming association corporation”

2. Parts of the marry;

A. CFF is a farming cooperative established with its principal office in Gyeonggi-gun D for the purpose of raising, selling, etc. of fish on October 5, 2010; LF is a farming cooperative established with its principal office in H, M, N,O as a director, representative director, director, or auditor of CFF as of April 28, 201, and E is a stock company established with the main office in Gwangju-gu P for the purpose of raising, selling, etc. of fish.

B. On September 8, 2012, the Defendant invested in the raising and selling of fish of the instant farming cooperative, and performed duties to attract other investors for the instant farming cooperative, and was registered as a director of the CF on September 8, 2012, and thereafter, was appointed to the representative director via the internal director of the E-listed corporation.

C. Upon the Defendant’s recommendation, the Plaintiff invested KRW 70 million in total, including KRW 20 million on January 6, 2012, KRW 30 million on January 20, 2012, and KRW 20 million on May 3, 2012 (hereinafter “the instant money”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1 through 4, 6, 8 through 9, 15 (including provisional numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), and the first instance court.

arrow