beta
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
Reasons
1. The reasons for this court’s acceptance of the judgment of the first instance are as follows. The reasons for this court’s acceptance are as follows: (a) the “unsaleable goods” of 17, 2, and the “unsaleable goods” of 2, 17, and (b) the Defendant’s addition of this court is identical to the reasons for the first instance judgment, except for the addition of the following “2. Additional determination” as to the assertion that
2. The defendant asserts that the defendant did not bear the responsibility to name the plaintiff, since the plaintiff knew or was grossly negligent on the part of the plaintiff who knew or did not know that the defendant lent the defendant's name to C.
The liability of the nominal lender under the provisions of Article 24 of the Commercial Act is to protect a third party who trades by misunderstanding the nominal titleholder as the business owner. Thus, if the other party to the transaction knew of, or was grossly negligent in, the fact of the nominal lender, the nominal lender shall not be liable. In this case, the burden of proof shall be borne by the nominal lender who asserts exemption as to whether the other party to the transaction knew or was grossly negligent
(Supreme Court Decision 200Da10512 Decided April 13, 2001). According to the above legal principle, G, who was an employee from A to March 2013, 201, was aware that “F” was operating the Defendant’s “loan of the Defendant’s name in a relationship with bad credit standing,” and the Plaintiff was also aware of such fact. C and the Plaintiff were to have prepared and issued a confirmation document stating that “A and the Plaintiff had a very friendship and a very friendship with each other.”
However, the fact that C transferred wages to H who had worked in the workplace at the time is as seen earlier, and in light of this, “C’s return to normally run,” and “C’s return to work in the same workplace,” and “F’s return to work in the same workplace as C.