logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2017.11.09 2017고정305
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the owner of a building in the Hongcheon-gun C and the third floor D located.

The Defendant operated D around March 28, 2015.

E controlled by the Hongcheon Police Station around April 9, 2015, and notified the Defendant of the fact that sexual traffic was being conducted in the building managed by the Defendant, upon receiving notification from the Hongcheon Police Station that “the above building was provided and used as a place for sexual traffic,” it provided D as a place for sexual traffic from February 21, 2017 to April 18, 2017.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the police officers of the accused;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect with respect to F;

1. Each police statement made to G, H and I;

1. Arrest report of the occurrence of the case, internal investigation report (D internal facilities and photographs), internal photo, etc. of D, internal photo, etc. (related to the control content of sexual traffic in the building in question), internal investigation report (related to the notification of the owner of the building regulating sexual traffic), notification of the result of the control of sexual traffic establishments (the copy of the notification of the owner of the building regulating sexual traffic), internal investigation report (the confirmation of sexual traffic in D building) / (the confirmation of the records of sexual traffic in D building) / (the defendant was unaware of whether sexual

The argument is asserted.

However, in light of the fact that the Defendant received notification from the Hongcheon Police Station around April 9, 2015 that “the above building was provided and used as a place for sexual traffic,” and the name of the establishment was “J”, it is deemed that the Defendant was sufficiently aware of the occurrence of sexual traffic in D.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 19 (1) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic for facts constituting an offense and Article 19 of the Act on the Punishment of such Acts;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow