A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of ballon trucks with B gallons, where the Defendant is engaged in driving of ballon trucks.

On October 21, 2016, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.186% during blood transfusions around 21:15, the Defendant driven the said cargo vehicle, and led to the two-lane road in front of D, which is located in C at the time of residing in the Gyeongbuk-do at the time of residing in the Gyeongbuk-do, one-lanes of the two-lane road from the narrow distance bank of bus terminals at the stable distance.

The Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, was negligent in driving the center line without properly operating the electric-time and steering operation of the steering system, was driven by the Defendant, and the part on the left side of the Frane car driven by the Victim E (40 o) who was driving on the adjacent frane vehicle was driven by the Defendant’s trucking part on the front side of the left side of the freight of the Defendant, and the part on the front part of the H Haystren car driven by the Defendant was driven by the Defendant’s trucking part on the front part of the freight of the Defendant.

The Defendant, by such occupational negligence, sustained the injury of light clocks, tensions, etc. to the above E in need of approximately two weeks of treatment, and the injury of light clocks, tensions, etc., which require approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim I (n, 39 years of age) who is the partner of the flock vehicle. The Defendant suffered from the injury to the above G, such as salt clocks, tensions, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of treatment.

Accordingly, the defendant was driving a motor vehicle in a situation where normal driving is difficult due to influence of drinking, thereby causing the victims to be injured.

2. Defendant 1, who violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), driven a bomb bomb boming vehicle, while under the influence of approximately 200 meters of alcohol content in the section of approximately 00 meters from the road front of the west, which is located in the West-dong at the time of the temporary bordering of the above 1.1 to the front of D in the same city C.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with respect to E and G;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a statement of actual investigation;