logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2017.07.20 2016가단110447
건물명도 등
Text

1.(a)

The defendant shall receive KRW 40,000,000 from the plaintiff and at the same time, each of the attached list to the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) Each real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter referred to as “real estate” is referred to as “each time,” and each of the above real estate is collectively referred to as “each of the instant real estate.”

(2) On May 18, 2010, the Plaintiff, the owner of each of the instant real estate, with the Defendant, set the lease contract between the Defendant and the terms of KRW 40,000,000 per deposit for lease, KRW 300,00 per month for rent (prepaid on May 10), and KRW 72 months for the term of lease (hereinafter “instant lease contract”).

(2) The Defendant paid KRW 1,00,000 to the Plaintiff on the date of conclusion of the instant lease agreement, and paid KRW 39,00,000 in the name of the Defendant’s spouse.

B. On June 1, 2010, the Plaintiff completed the registration of the establishment of a right to lease on a deposit basis (hereinafter “the right to lease on a deposit basis”) under Article 11966 of the Act on the Establishment of a right to lease on a deposit basis (hereinafter “the right to lease on a deposit basis”) and Article 11966 of the Act on the Establishment of a right to lease on a deposit basis (hereinafter “the right to lease on a deposit basis”) to the Changwon District Court for the establishment of a right to lease on a deposit basis (hereinafter “the right to lease on a deposit basis”). On the same day, the Plaintiff completed the registration of the establishment of a right to lease on a deposit basis (hereinafter “the right to lease on a deposit basis”).

C. 1) After the conclusion of a lease agreement, the Defendant operated the Medical Care Center with the name “D” in the instant building. 2) The Plaintiff filed a civil lawsuit against the Defendant by asserting the termination of the instant lease agreement (this Court Decision 2010Da46421), and on April 14, 2011, the Plaintiff and the Defendant adjusted the following: “The Plaintiff and the Defendant verify the existence of the rights and obligations under the lease agreement (lease 40 million won, monthly rent 300,000, monthly rent 300,000, and period from June 10, 2010 to 74).”

3. The contract of this case was terminated upon expiration of the period of validity.

arrow