The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The lower court found the Defendant guilty of mistake of fact, even though the Defendant did not know that an accident occurred and operated a vehicle as it is and did not escape.

B. The sentence of the lower court’s unfair sentencing (one year of imprisonment, two years of suspended sentence, protection observation, and forty hours of lecture of compliance driving) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the lower court’s judgment and the evidence duly admitted and investigated in the trial of the lower court as to the assertion of misunderstanding of facts, the Defendant, immediately after the U.S. internship, knew that the occurrence of an accident occurred due to the sound that the victim’s vehicle follows balke or the sound that conflicts with road walls.

It is reasonable to view it.

1) 피해자의 차량이 1 차선에서 진행하던 중 피고인의 트럭을 피하려 다가 급정차하였고, 급제동으로 인하여 차량이 오른쪽으로 차선을 가로질러 미끄러져 가다가 3 차선 우측 끝에 있는 자동차 전용도로의 오른쪽 도로 벽을 강하게 충돌하였으며, 그 충격으로 다시 튕겨 져 나와 왼쪽으로 차선을 가로질러 좌측 가드레일을 충격하여, 피해자의 차량이 급정차하는 소리와 도로 벽에 충돌하는 소리가 크게 발생하였을 것으로 보인다.

In addition, the Defendant, at the time of U-turning, did not have any circumstance to obstruct understanding of surrounding circumstances because he was in a state where he was a driver’s seat and chief window, and was not in a state where he was placed a big frame, and was not in a state where he was in a state where he was carried out for U-turn, and did not hear the above sound.

It is difficult to see it.

2) 피고인은 유턴 직후 차량의 비상등을 켠 상태로 잠시 정지하거나 서행한 것으로 볼 때 사건 현장에서 사고가 발생한 것을 인식하고 잠시 상황을 살피다가 도주하였다고

There are circumstances to see.

3) The victim is under the police in the court.