logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2013.10.30 2013고단642
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(알선수재)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant was appointed as the police officer on October 19, 1978, and served in the F police station from March 13, 2006 to February 6, 2009 as the police university E, while the Defendant was serving in the F police station from February 4, 2012 to February 4, 2012.

G around July 2008, in order to solve the problems of violation of the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act, while being investigated in violation of the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act by the Daegu Northern Police Station, the Daegu Northern Police Station introduced and asked for the introduction of a person who is a witness to the investigation, and H asks for the introduction of a police-related person to the branch, and I asked for the introduction of a police-related person to the branch, and I asked for the submission of the police-related person.

Around July 24, 2008, the Defendant received a request from H and I to help you deal with the above two cases in a restaurant in which the trade name near the Gangnam-gu Seoul Masung apartment is unknown, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, with H and I, and “In the Republic of Korea, he is currently working as a police team E professor as an incumbent police team.” The inside of the Republic of Korea means that “The inside of the Republic of Korea is currently working as a professor of the Police Team. The inside of the Republic of Korea may cleanly adjust the case.”

The Defendant continued to move to K as an entertainment drinking house in J, and asked G through a police officer on the case of the case of violation of the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act (hereinafter “K”), saying, “The case of violation of the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act (hereinafter “The Act”) by the police officer on the part of J, was suffering from the suspension of prosecution.” The Defendant was provided with entertainment equivalent to KRW 1.2 million (6 million ± 5 million) by having H, I, and after late late drinking with L, drink, and bear 6 million won of the drinking value.

B. Around the 29th day of the same month, the Defendant made a promise to meet G with phone calls and around the same month, and around the 30th day of the same month, “N” in “N” located in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, G is well aware of the person in charge of Lidong Police Station.

arrow