logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2020.09.03 2018다283773
부당이득반환 청구의 소
Text

All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal by the plaintiffs are assessed against the plaintiffs and the defendant.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. As to the Defendant’s ground of appeal

A. Article 107(1) of the Local Tax Act provides that “A person who actually owns property” that is liable to pay property tax pursuant to Article 107(1) means a person who owns a real ownership of the relevant land or property, regardless of whether a title truster is registered as an owner on the public register (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2010Du4964, Dec. 13, 2012). In cases of a three-party registered title trust between a title truster and a title trustee who directly executes a title trust agreement with the title trustee and conducts an ownership transfer of the relevant real estate under the name of the title trustee, the title truster’s status as a purchaser is not different from that of the general sales contract (see, e.g., Supreme Court en banc Decision 2014Du4310, Mar. 22, 2018). If the title truster concluded a sales contract on real estate and paid all the purchase amount, barring any special circumstance, the title truster is liable to pay property tax imposed on the title trustee or the title trustee’s.

arrow