logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.06.14 2018나463
중개수수료
Text

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

judgment of the first instance.

Reasons

1. The facts of the claim (1) Nonparty C, as co-ownership by himself and others, requested brokerage around 2016 to sell the land and the building on the ground (hereinafter referred to as the "land and building of this case") of Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Incheon, which is the object of the leasing business, to the "E Licensed Real Estate Agent Office (RepresentativeF)" which is one of its customers at the time of 2016. ② The Plaintiff, who operates the "G Licensed Real Estate Agent Office at Ansan-si, requested brokerage commission to the Plaintiff in cooperation with himself (in this case, the Plaintiff and F is not a licensed real estate agent, and the Plaintiff is operating the business by lending another person's name. However, the Plaintiff was informed of the desired sale amount of KRW 2.2 billion to the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff did not have the right to request brokerage commission to the Plaintiff at the time of 10 billion after the purchase, and the Plaintiff did not have the right to request brokerage commission at the time of 200 million won after the purchase of the real property of this case.

arrow