logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2014.09.04 2014고단953
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months;

2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 19, 2008, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2,50,000,000,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) from the Suwon District Court on the same support on April 6, 2009, a fine of KRW 1,50,000,000 for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) at the Suwon District Court on June 14, 2012, and a fine of KRW 2,50,00,000 for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) at the Suwon District Court on March 25, 2014. However, the Defendant did not obtain a driving license at approximately 50 meters from the front of the Suwon department department of New-si in the same Dong from the Do to the front of the Hyundai apartment in the same Dong on March 23:30, 2014.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A driver's license inquiry and a written report placed on driving with the driver's license;

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of criminal records, investigation reports (former records and attachment reports of judgment) and Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on Probation and Order to Attend Education do not have room for improvement in that the defendant was punished five times for the same crime prior to the crime of this case, and there is no room for improvement in that the defendant committed the crime of this case. However, the confession of the crime of this case is divided while making a confession of the crime of this case, efforts are being made to prevent recidivism by receiving treatment from a mental hospital or saving his vehicle into the scrapping box for alcohol treatment, and the defendant is responsible for the livelihood of his family, including the remaining medical treatment expenses for the vehicle suffering from the quality of liver at once.

arrow