logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.08.14 2017고단4423
사문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant operated a adult resting room with the trade name of Busan Dongdong-gu B and the third floor “C”, and the control was several times, and was in an internal relationship.

D Operation in the name of D and finally, around December 2014, D and D operated the above rest room from January 2015.

On August 26, 2016, the Defendant filed a suit for demanding the return of the gold in custody with the purport that “D, from 2012 to 26 August 2016, 2016, which is entrusted to D with the management of D, shall return the proceeds of the above C to the Defendant and shall change the name of the above adult resting room from D to the Defendant.”

A. The Defendant: (a) drafted a letter stating that “any money brought about by the horse or internal house in a monetary relationship is returned to the money left from the door; and (b) returned to the remainder; (c) by the end of December, 2016, the name “D” was written at the bottom of the document; and (d) signed on the name “D” at the end of December.

As a result, the defendant has forged a copy of a private document related to rights and obligations for the purpose of exercising.

B. On November 10, 2016, the Defendant of a forged private document filed a complaint with the effect that the amount equivalent to KRW 160 million in custody of C’s profits should be returned from the Busan District Court’s Civil Conciliation Division 3 head office located in the Busan District Court’s Dong-dong, Busan District Court, to D on November 10, 2016, at the end of the second conciliation of the case where the “Lawsuit for Return of Money in Custody” was submitted to the conciliation, and exercised it as if it was a document duly formed by the commissioner of the Busan District Court E, who was aware of the forgery on the date of the second conciliation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to D;

1. A criminal investigation report (the report is 4 times a month, the complaint, the answer, and each prepared document);

1. A request for appraisal and a response to a request for appraisal;

arrow