1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. The plaintiffs' assertion

A. The plaintiffs are the members of E religious organization FI, and the defendant is the labor association to which the FII will belong.

B. The Defendant’s proceeding with Plaintiff A’s non-voting on April 26, 2015 and the judgment on the consignment judgment and the Plaintiffs’ appeal on September 3, 2015 are unlawful for the following reasons, etc.

1) To submit a petition for an entrusted judgment to the Defendant, the FIE must state the petitioner in the petition for the entrusted judgment. To submit a petition for an entrusted judgment in the name of the chairman of the party branch, a resolution of the party branch must be made. However, there was no resolution of the party branch. 2) The Plaintiff opposed to the petition for a joint meeting (defluence) and the entrusted judgment, but the document stating the petition was not accompanied.

3) Although the plaintiffs appealed against the entrusted judgment and the general assembly returned the case to the defendant, the defendant did not open the hearing date and decided the same contents as the previous judgment. 4) In the case of dismissal, expulsion, or expulsion, conditional judgment was not possible.

5) In particular, a non-voting vote was unlawful for the following reasons. (A) The Defendant’s G pressured the Plaintiff A to take a measure, i.e., a physical response, on April 17, 2015.

B) On April 26, 2015, Defendant H had no resolution of the political party’s meeting to reply to the question of Plaintiff C, “ what is the crime title of the A,” and the F church’s member should hold a joint meeting as the president. However, Defendant C’s investigative process committee (H) carried out a joint meeting even though the F church member should hold a joint meeting with the president, Defendant C’s voting was held by a non-qualified person at the time of non-voting, and the quorum was lacking in the quorum. E) the non-voting petition is an administrative case, and the petition was filed in accordance with the judicial process.

F. The election campaign should not be carried out artificially, and there was no reason to do so.

C. In addition, the Defendant I is going to do so on October 1, 2015, which was before the said judgment of entrustment becomes final and conclusive, to the Feminant of the Feminian J.