The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Around 04:50 on September 1, 2016, the Defendant of a public lawsuit room: (a) committed assault against the victim by refusing to return home upon the victim’s request from the victim that he/she would return to the end of his/her business; and (b) putting the victim’s right shoulder with his/her son and hand to report it.

Although the facts charged on the market constitute a violation of Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, since the victim expressed his/her intention not to prosecute on November 14, 2016 after the prosecution, the prosecution is dismissed by judgment in accordance with Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act and Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so ordered as per Disposition.