logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2014.03.31 2013고정812
절도
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 19, 2013, the Defendant: (a) placed the victim E in the Damart located in the Damart located in the Damsan-si, the victim E’s surveillance was neglected; (b) placed the 5,300 Seoul U.S. market price at 1 liter and the 1,500 U.S. market price at 5,30 won in the Kamart-si; and (c) stolen goods worth KRW 6,800,000 in the Kampt-si.

2. The Defendant, at around 18:00 on November 2, 2013, at the same method at the place prescribed in paragraph (1), stolen goods worth KRW 6,800 in total, holding 1,500, the market price of 1 liter and 1 liter of Seoul milk 1 liter in the same manner as the goods at the place prescribed in paragraph (1).

3. At around 18:50 on November 9, 2013, the Defendant: (a) by the same method at the place prescribed in paragraph (1) of the same Article, destroyed the 36,450 won worth of 9,800 won at the market price; (b) 1 set of 1,500 won at the market price; and (c) 1 set of 1,500 won at the market price; and (c) 36,450 won at the market price.

4. 피고인은 2013. 11. 10. 12:20경 제1항의 장소에서 같은 방법으로 시가 31,800원 상당의 갈치팩 2개, 시가 7,400원 상당의 풀무원 순살 떡볶이 2개를 몰래 가지고 나와 합계 39,200원 상당의 물품을 절취하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on internal investigation;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow