logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2020.08.13 2020고합41
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the vice president of Company B (hereinafter referred to as “B”) and C (hereinafter referred to as “C”), and D is the former representative director of Company B, E is a registration director of Company B and a registration director of Company C, and F is a representative director of Company G (hereinafter referred to as “G”) and a working-level person of Company C.

1. When the Defendant, D, E, and F’s joint criminal conduct (hereinafter “H”), around December 207, following the crisis of the abolition of the KOSDAQ due to managerial difficulties, the Defendant, D, E, and F paid the amount equivalent to the amount equivalent to the amount equivalent to the amount equivalent to the amount equivalent to the amount equivalent to the amount of the capital for the capital for the capital increase under the name of the Defendant, and the Defendant paid the amount equivalent to the amount equivalent to the amount equivalent to the amount of the capital for the capital increase under the pretext of H’s acquisition to the Defendant, and then returned the amount equivalent to the amount of the capital increase under the name of the Defendant’s acquisition to the Plaintiff by having the Defendant withdraw the amount equivalent to the amount of the capital increase under the pretext of the capital increase to the Plaintiff, E, and F paid the capital increase by using it to the bondholder and immediately return the amount to the bondholder, and the Defendant offered cooperation on February 208, 2008.

According to the above plan, Defendant, D, E, and F proposed that B would pay the consideration to the victim I, who is the representative director of H and the owner of 100% shares of the shares, to whom H will take over H under the name of the Defendant. The Defendant, as the nominal owner of H acquisition contract, falsely neglected the value of H to the amount equivalent to the amount equivalent to the amount equivalent to the amount equivalent to the amount equivalent to the capital increase for new shares after acquiring the shares and the management right, and transferred H to B, and D from the Defendant.

arrow