1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On October 19, 1993, the Mutual Aid and Finance Company of the Measures Agency loaned a loan of KRW 7 million to the Defendant on October 19, 1993 at the rate of 19.0% per annum, 16.2% per annum, and 20% per annum.

(hereinafter “Claims for loans of this case”). (b)

The claim for the loan of this case against the defendant in the Korea Exchange and Finance Company of the Korea Exchange and Finance Company of the Korea Exchange and Finance Company of the Korea Exchange and Finance Corporation of the Korea Exchange and Finance Corporation of the Korea Exchange and Finance Corporation of the Korea Exchange and Finance Corporation of the Korea Exchange and Finance Corporation of the Korea Exchange and Finance Corporation of the Korea Exchange and Finance Corporation of the Korea Exchange and Finance Corporation of the Korea Exchange

C. As of May 15, 2015 (Calculation of interest, etc. up to May 14, 2015), the Defendant’s obligation to pay the above loans remains worth KRW 12,814,550, totaling KRW 12,214,54, including principal and interest, etc.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 4, purport of whole pleadings

2. According to the facts of the above recognition, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff the amount of the above loan 12,814,550 won and the principal 600,006 won among them, delay damages calculated by the rate of 20% per annum, which is the overdue interest rate from May 15, 2015 to the day of full payment, from May 15, 2015 to the day of full payment.

3. The defendant's assertion

A. On October 29, 199, the Defendant asserted that the principal of the instant loan was fully repaid through an auction procedure, etc. with respect to real estate owned by the Defendant (type B B B, 274 square meters and above-ground houses) and the remainder of the interest, etc. were reimbursed by the Defendant. However, it is insufficient to recognize that the Defendant was awarded a successful bid in accordance with the procedures for voluntary auction on the register of the registry of the above real estate attached to the statement of grounds for appeal, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge

B. The Defendant asserts that the extinctive prescription period of the instant loan claim has expired, and thus, the instant loan claim Nos. 5, 6, 8, and 15.