The accused shall dismiss an application for compensation by the applicant for compensation of the acquitted;

1. On May 1, 2011, the Defendant made a false statement in the facts charged that “B shall transfer E’s “F,” U.S. “F,” to E in the office of (State) C, operated by E during the Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, 201. In the company run by the Party, the Defendant would attract investment of approximately KRW 40,500,000,000,000,000,000) from the said U.S. law firm for the development of Cambodia.”

However, the Defendant did not transfer the above Frop to East Asia-Pacific department, and even if there was no agreement with the above Lrop to attract the investment, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to attract the amount equivalent to the above Frop to E normally, such as preparing at will a contract for investment with the effect that “within 90 million dollars from the contract date shall be paid to the victim within 90 days from the contract date and the remaining funds shall be invested within 150 days from the contract date.”

From May 3, 201 to June 2, 2011, the Defendant: (a) had the Defendant, E, the vice president G, and H, introduced by the Defendant, from May 3, 201 to June 2, 201, disbursed USD 12,00 in the name of security, such as accommodation expenses, for an on-site response to Cambodiansan Development; (b) had the Defendant disbursed USD 11,500 in the above U.S. flight fee of H around June 1, 201; (c) had the Defendant remitted USD 20,00 to H’s account as an aviation fee for the U.S. attorneyF on June 10, 201; and (d) had the Defendant, on June 12, 2011, remitted the amount of USD 6,500 in the above domestic hotel under the name of the Plaintiff’s attorney-at-law to KRW 10,00 in the account.

Accordingly, the Defendant, as above, by deceiving E, obtained property benefits equivalent to USD 60,000 in total to H, F, etc. including the Defendant.

2. According to the records of this case, the Defendant and E.